Session details: 18 October 2024, venue- B-Block Resource Room, Ocean Sciences Campus
Aim:
A conversation about responsible AI use in health professional education. Discussing the risks and the opportunities of AI in learning and teaching.
Format:
The interactive session was based on informative, thought-provoking presentations by Adrew Thuo, a Learning Technologist in the Digital Learning Experience Design & Innovation (LXD) department. These presentations were engaging with input and practical insights from Simon Venter and Khanyiso Themba of the Humanities Faculty and our very own Health Sciences colleagues.
Programme for the day
Faculty of Health Sciences: Learning and Teaching Directorate
Artificial Intelligence (AI) considerations for Health Professional Education
|
B Block Resource Room, Ocean Science Campus |
18 October 2024, 13:00 - 15:00
|
13:00-13:20 |
Light refreshments |
13:20-13:2=250 |
Welcoming and opening remarks: Mrs Carmen Whittle |
13:25-14:10 |
AI in education: Mr Andrew Thuo |
14:10-14:30 |
AI experiences in the learning and teaching space: Mr Simon Venter, Mr Khanyiso Themba
|
14:30-14:35 |
Comfort break |
14:35 – 14:55 |
Reflective engagement and way forward: All |
14:55-15:00 |
Closing remarks : Prof Annaline Keet |
|
|
Discussions:
Andrew Thuo’s presentation covered an array of interesting aspects including:
AI overview:
-
A brief history of ChatGPT
-
What can it and can’t it do?
-
How does it work?
-
How was ChatGPT developed?
-
Foundation models vs Tools
-
Text generators (ChatGPT3.5 and 4 (Open AI, LeChat, Google’s Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude)
-
Image generators (Dall-E, Bing-image generator, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney)
-
Video generators (Synthesia, Opus, Heygen, Sora)
-
AI tools for teaching
-
Opportunities for assessment in a world with AI tools
Key takeaway
Here's a summary of the discussion (Thanks to Gemini that summarised the transcript by focussing on AI usage in Learning and Teaching and the suggestions for the way forward}:
The discussion primarily centered around the increasing use of AI, particularly GPT, in academic and professional settings. Key points included:
Benefits of AI:
-
Efficiency: Automating tasks like generating text, code, and graphics.
-
Accessibility: Breaking down language barriers through translation tools.
-
Innovation: Enabling new forms of creative expression and problem-solving.
Challenges and Concerns:
-
Bias and Discrimination: AI models can perpetuate biases present in the data they are trained on.
-
Misinformation: AI-generated content can spread false or misleading information.
-
Ethical Considerations: Issues related to privacy, intellectual property, and the misuse of AI.
Recommendations:
-
Education and Training: Promoting digital literacy and critical thinking skills to help individuals navigate the AI landscape.
-
Ethical Guidelines: Developing and enforcing ethical guidelines for AI development and use.
-
Collaboration: Fostering collaboration between academia, industry, and policymakers to address the challenges and opportunities of AI.
Specific Use Cases in Academia:
-
Student Support: AI-powered tutoring systems and personalized learning experiences.
-
Research: Accelerating research processes through data analysis and synthesis.
-
Teaching and Learning: Creating engaging and interactive learning materials.
Overall, the discussion highlighted the potential of AI to revolutionize education and research, while also acknowledging the need for responsible and ethical use of this powerful
Participant Feedback
Twelve participants attended, including a Director of School, an HoD, senior lecturers, lecturers and associate lecturers. Of the twelve participants, eleven completed the Feedback form. The consolidated feedback:
|
Strongly Agree
|
Agree
|
Neutral
|
Disagree
|
Strongly Disagree
|
How clear and well-defined were the discussion topics?
|
4
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
To what extent did you feel actively involved in the discussion?
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
How effective was the facilitator in keeping the discussion focused and moving forward?
|
7
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
In your opinion, did the roundtable discussion achieve its intended goals?
|
7
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Did the discussion include a wide range of perspectives on the topic(s)?
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
How satisfied were you with the opportunity to share your own ideas and perspectives?
|
6
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
General feedback and comments:
“Thank you for organising such conversations. It really helps with learning and teaching.”
“Very useful session”
“Thank you, very interesting.”
Suggestions:
“More conversations that includes students’ perspectives.”
“Would be lovely to engage further.”
“Further workshops on AI are required.”
“We could have a monthly workshop, an online space to chat and share information, a newsletter or an institutional quarterly publication of AI in HPE.”
Recommendations
-
Based on the evaluation results and participant feedback, provide recommendations for future training programs on AI.